Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UNIPAK INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of UNIPAK INC. in 715 E. WASHINGTON STREET, WEST CHESTER, PA 19380 (NAICS 322212). OSHA activity number 343791810.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Unipak INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Unipak INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
UNIPAK INC.
Site address
715 E. WASHINGTON STREET
City
WEST CHESTER
State
PA
ZIP
19380
Mailing
715 E. WASHINGTON STREET, WEST CHESTER, PA 19380
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322212
Employees
32
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Abate by
Aug 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,956 · Current $5,171 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following:  Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.    a) Jobsite: Baling Press machine, pit - The employer did not ensure employees discarding material in the 10 foot deep pit with unprotected sides and edges were protected from falling.     Observed on or about 2/15/19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5171.4
  • — Z (S) $7956

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Abate by
Aug 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  a) Jobsite: Bobst SP1080 die cutter - Employees operating the die cutter to manufacture packaging material were exposed to amputation hazards from the unguarded platen of the machine.  b) Jobsite: Vega 750 - Employees operating the Vega 750 for stripping and packaging operations were exposed to ingoing nip point hazards from the unguarded running green belt of the machine.   Observed on or about 2/21/19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $9282

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Abate by
Aug 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,586 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving.    a) Jobsite: Delta 8" Bench Grinder - The employer did not securely anchor the bench grinder designed for fixed locations to the work station.    Observed on or about 2/15/19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2585.7
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch.  a) Jobsite: Dayton 8" Bench Grinder - Employees who used the bench grinder to grind material without an adjustable tongue guard were exposed to struck by hazards.   Observed on or about 2/15/19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $6,033 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o).    b) Jobsite: Vega 750, feeding end, side of machine - Employees operating the Vega 750 for stripping and packaging operations were exposed entanglement and amputation hazards without the use of a cover to guard the exposed pulley and belt assembly.    Observed on or about 2/15/19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6033.3
  • — Z (S) $9282

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Abate by
Aug 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,586 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.    a) Jobsite: Baler area - Employees were exposed to flying debris and compressed air hazards as the air hose they used to blow off debris and dust from their body and clothing was not reduced to less than 30 psi.    Observed on or about 2/15/19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2585.7
  • — Z (S) $3978

1910.305 B01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $3,448 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed.    a) Jobsite: Baler area, junction box above computer table - The top of the energized junction box was missing a knockout exposing employees to shock hazards.    Observed on or about 2/15/19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3447.6
  • — Z (S) $5304

1910.303 B02

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2019
Abate by
Aug 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling.  a) Jobsite: Computer station by the baler - The relocatable power tap which provided power to industrial floor fans were not installed in accordance with the instructions included in the listing and labeling.  Observed on or about 2/15/19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Unipak INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343791810.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.