BENOIT, MS —
OSHA Inspection: KIRK SATTERFIELD, DWAYNE SATTERFIELD, NANCY SATTERFIELD
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of KIRK SATTERFIELD, DWAYNE SATTERFIELD, NANCY SATTERFIELD in 1546 LONG SHOT RD., BENOIT, MS 38725 (NAICS 111160). OSHA activity number 343801734.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- 1546 LONG SHOT RD.
- City
- BENOIT
- State
- MS
- ZIP
- 38725
- Mailing
- 313 PALMER SATTERFIELD RD, BENOIT, MS 38725
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 111160
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $3,182 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): (a) Rice Bin #14 - On or about February 14, 2019 openings in floor for unload auger were not fully guarded while employees worked inside of rice bin exposing employees to amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3182.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,273 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): (a) Bin Loading/Unloading Area - On or about February 14, 2019 the fill auger had unguarded pullies with ingoing nip points, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2273.4
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.219 E02 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(2)(i): Overhead horizontal belt(s) with lower parts seven 7 feet or less from the floor(s) or platform(s) were not guarded on the sides and bottom in accordance with the requirements specified at CFR 1910.219(o)(3)(a): (a) Bin Loading/Unloading Area - On or about February 14, 2019 the fill auger had an unguarded belts with ingoing nip points, exposing employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.272 D
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,364 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(d): The employer did not develop and implement an emergency action plan meeting the requirements contained in 1910.38(a): (a) Grain Storage Bins - On or about February 14, 2019 the employer had not developed an emergency action plan for employees directed to perform grain handling activities in storage facilities exposing employees to engulfment, machine guarding and combustible dust hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1363.8
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.272 E01 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,273 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(e)(1)(ii): Current employees and new employees prior to starting work in the grain handling facility were not trained in the specific procedures and safety practices applicable to their job tasks including but not limited to cleaning procedures for grinding equipment, clearing procedures for choked legs, housekeeping procedures, hot work procedures, preventive maintenance procedures and lockout tagout procedures: (a) Grain Storage Bins - On or about February 14, 2019 the employer did not provided training on lockout/tagout procedures for employees who were exposed to the unexpected start up or the unexpected release of stored energy from machinery and equipment, exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2273.4
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.272 G01 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(ii): All mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and pneumatic equipment which presents a danger to employees inside grain storage structures was not de-energized and disconnected, locked-out and tagged, blocked-off, or otherwise prevented from operating by other equally effective means or methods: (a) Rice Bin #14 - On or about February 14, 2019 during installation of the sweep auger employees were exposed to caught-in or caught between hazards as a result of the unload floor auger not being locked out.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.272 G01 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $2,273 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(i): The employer did not issue a permit for entering bins, silos, or tanks and the employer or the employer's representative (who would otherwise authorize the permit) was not present during the entire operation: (a) Rice Storage Bin #14 - On or about February 14, 2019 the employer did not issue a bin entry permit and did not ensure a representative was present during the entire operation while employees were performing work inside the storage bin, exposing employees to caught-in and caught between hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2273.4
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.272 G03
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(3): An observer, equipped to provide assistance, was not stationed outside the bin, silo, or tank being entered by an employee. Communications (visual, voice, or signal line) were not maintained between the observer and employee entering the bin, silo, or tank: (a) Rice Storage Bin#14 - On or about February 14, 2019 the employer did not ensure an observer was present at all times outside of the grain bin while employees were performing work inside the bin, exposing employees to caught-in and caught between hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,364 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): Where there was a defect or evidence of damage that could expose an employee to injury, the defective or damaged item was not removed from service until the repairs and tests necessary to render the electric equipment safe had been made: (a) Grain Storage Area - On or about February 14, 2019 the employer allowed to use extension cords with damaged insulation, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1363.8
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification which included the requirements as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): (a) Grain Storage Area - On or about February 14, 2019 the employer had not certified that a personal protective equipment hazard assessment for each job task employees performed, exposing employees to eye, engulfment and respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.272 G02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(2): When entering the grain handling facility bins, silos, or tanks from the top, employees did not wear a body harness with lifeline, or use a boatswain's chair that met the requirements of Subpart D, 29 CFR 1910.28(j)(a): (a) Grain Storage Bins - On or about February 14, 2019 the employer did not ensure employees who are required to take samples from rice storage bins enter the bins from the top and wear a body harness with lifeline, or use a boatswain's chair, exposing employees to engulfment hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.303 G01 VII B
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(vii)(B): Outdoor electric equipment was not installed in suitable enclosures and/or was not protected from accidental contact by unauthorized personnel, or by vehicular traffic, or by accidental spillage or leakage from piping systems: (a) Rice Bin #14, west side - On or about February 14, 2019 the control box for a fan did not have its top cover in place which allowed access to uninsulated electrical connections and was not weatherproof, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.305 J02 VII
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 23, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(2)(vii): A receptacle installed in a wet location where the product intended to be plugged into it was to be attended while in use (for example, portable tools) did not have an enclosure that was weatherproof when the attachment plug cap was removed: (a) Grain Storage Area, North West Side - On or about February 14, 2019 receptacles located outdoors were not weatherproof, exposing employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Kirk Satterfield, Dwayne Satterfield, Nancy Satterfield
View Kirk Satterfield, Dwayne Satterfield, Nancy Satterfield's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 111160)
More inspections in MS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343801734.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.