Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: STARFIRE CORPORATION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of STARFIRE CORPORATION in 22 MAIN ST., TOLEDO, OH 43605 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 343809802.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Starfire Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Starfire Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
22 MAIN ST.
City
TOLEDO
State
OH
ZIP
43605
Mailing
682 COLE ROAD, CARROLLTOWN, PA 15722
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
713990
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2019
Abate by
Nov 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $11,934
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to burn and struck-by hazards.  a. Starfire Corporation worksite located at 22 Main Street, Toledo, Ohio:  On or about February 23, 2019, employees were exposed to burn and struck-by hazards from the inadvertent ignition and launching of aerial shells due to the removal of the protective shrouds covering the ends of the electronic matches used to ignite the shell's quick fuses.  The aerial shells were not equipped with a plastic T-connector to accept the shrouded end of the electronic match which required employees to remove the shroud and directly attach the unprotected electric match head to the end of the quick fuse, thereby exposing the match head to friction, static electricity, and damage.  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to follow manufacturer guidelines, company policies, and 2018 NFPA 1123 Code for Fireworks Display Section 4.2.2.6 to ensure that electric matches that are attached to display fireworks have a shroud protecting the match head.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $11934
  • · C (S) $11934
  • · Z (S) $11934

5(a)(1)

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2019
Abate by
Sep 15, 2026
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $1,000 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to burn and struck-by hazards.  a. Starfire Corporation worksite located at 22 Main Street, Toledo, Ohio:  On or about February 23, 2019, the employer did not ensure wooden mortar racks were designed to withstand a catastrophic aerial shell malfunction in the mortar, exposing employees to burn and struck-by hazards from the aerial shells.  During display set-up, an aerial shell exploded in a 6 inch mortar which caused a number of mortars to be expelled from the mortar rack, destroying the mortar rack.  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to follow 2018 NFPA 1123 Code for Fireworks Display Section 4.6.1 by using mortar racks that prevent repositioning and are designed to withstand a shell exploding in a mortar, which causes the mortar to burst.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $1000
  • · C (S) $11934
  • · Z (S) $11934

5(a)(1)

Other-than-serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2019
Abate by
Nov 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $9,547 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to burn and struck-by hazards.  a. Starfire Corporation worksite located at 22 Main Street, Toledo, Ohio:  On or about February 23, 2019, the employer did not ensure precautions were taken to prevent the accumulation and discharge of static electricity when handling and preparing fireworks during display set-up.  Accumulation and discharge of static electricity could ignite the aerial shells and expose employees to burn and struck-by hazards.  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to follow manufacturer's guidelines and company policies to guard against static electricity by wearing anti static devices and using work practices that reduce the likelihood of static electricity accumulation.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (O) $9547.2
  • · C (S) $11934
  • · Z (S) $11934

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 10, 2019
Abate by
Nov 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $11,934 · Current $11,934
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact.  a. Starfire Corporation worksite located at 22 Main Street, Toledo, Ohio:  On or about February 23, 2019, employees setting up a fire works display were wearing synthetic clothing, which could exacerbate burn hazards if exposed to hot embers.  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is for employees to wear clothing as specified and permitted in NFPA-1123.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $11934
  • · C (S) $11934
  • · Z (S) $11934

View Starfire Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343809802.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.