LUBBOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE MORENO FRAMING FN
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE MORENO FRAMING FN in 6952 26TH ST, LUBBOCK, TX 79416 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343814182.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE MORENO FRAMING FN
- Site address
- 6952 26TH ST
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79416
- Mailing
- 7326 AMHERST ST., LUBBOCK, TX 79416
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,023 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets: a) At the construction site, employees exposed to overhead hazards were not wearing hardhats.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1023
- — Z (S) $1705
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: a) At the construction site, where tubular welded frame scaffolding had not been erected under the direction of a competent person.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2386.5
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a) At the construction site, where the working level of tubular welded frame scaffolding was not fully decked between the uprights.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills: a) At the construction site, where base plates and mud sills were not used with fabricated frame scaffolding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a) At the construction site, where the end frames and cross-bracing of tubular welded frame scaffolding was used for access and egress as no ladder was provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C02
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(2): Tubular welded frames and panels were not braced by cross, horizontal, or diagonal braces, or combination thereof, which would have secured vertical members together laterally: a) At the construction site, where tubular welded frame scaffolding lacked cross-bracing on the inside face.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.452 C03
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(c)(3): Frames and panels were not joined together vertically by coupling or stacking pins or equivalent means: a) At the construction site, where tubular welded frame scaffolding lacked vertical stacking pins.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): a) At the construction site, where employees working more than six feet above the ground were not protected from falling by any type of a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2386.5
- — Z (S) $3978
More inspections at Jose Moreno Framing FN
View Jose Moreno Framing FN's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343814182.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.