Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARIANA INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING GEORGIA LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ARIANA INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING GEORGIA LLC in 146 COMMERCE COURT, RINCON, GA 31326 (NAICS 493190). OSHA activity number 343817672.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ariana International Shipping Georgia LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ariana International Shipping Georgia LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
146 COMMERCE COURT
City
RINCON
State
GA
ZIP
31326
Mailing
146 COMMERCE COURT, RINCON, GA 31326
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493190
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.  a). Warehouse Building and Outdoors - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer allowed employees to operate three Toyota Forklift Trucks and a Hyundai Forklift without the use of the restraint device (i.e. seatbelt), thus exposing employees to an ejection hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2386.8
  • · Z (S) $3978

1910.110 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,364 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(7): LP gas container storage location(s) were not provided with at least one approved portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 8-B, C.  a). Outdoors, near the entry gate - On February 27, 2019, a portable fire extinguisher was not provided in the area where the forklift liquid propane gas cylinders were stored, thus exposing employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1363.8
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s).  a). Outdoors - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, a Hyundai forklift (model: 70DS-7E) was operated with an inoperable horn and with worn/damaged tires, thus exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2386.8
  • · Z (S) $3978

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined at least daily prior to being placed into service.  a). Warehouse Building and Outdoors - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, three Toyota Forklift Trucks and a Hyundai forklift were not inspected daily prior to being placed into service, thus exposing employees to stuck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,364 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.  a). Outdoors - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees that handled hazardous chemicals to include, but not limited to liquid propane gas and diesel fuel, thus exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1363.8
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use.  a). Outdoors - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not have a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical that was used to include, but not limited to diesel fuel and liquid propane gas, thus exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on the hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.  a). Outdoors - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not provide chemical hazard training and information to employees that handled hazardous chemicals to include, but not limited to diesel fuel, thus exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace.  a). Warehouse Building and Outdoors - On or about and times prior to February 27, 2019, the employer did not ensure that employees who operated Toyota Forklift Trucks and a Hyundai forklift completed forklift training that consisted of formal instruction and an evaluation of their competency, thus exposing employees to a programmatic hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343817672.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.