Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: LYNN DICKEY CONSTRUCTION, INC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of LYNN DICKEY CONSTRUCTION, INC in 176 MANITOU, MAUMELLE, AR 72113 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 343818142.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lynn Dickey Construction, INC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lynn Dickey Construction, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
176 MANITOU
City
MAUMELLE
State
AR
ZIP
72113
Mailing
#1 DEER VALLEY COVE, MAUMELLE, AR 72113
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) On February 27, 2019, employees who were working below employees engaged in masonry construction were not wearing hard hats. This condition exposed employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.102 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  (a) On or about February 27, 2019, employees were exposed to struck-by hazard while cutting bricks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.300 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): Power operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:  (a) Employees were using Dewalt Chop Saws without guards, while cutting masonry bricks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):    (a) On February 27, 2019, the working platform of the scaffold was not fully planked on an ~25' working level and an ~20' working level. This condition exposed employees to the hazard of falling to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  (a) On February 27, 2019, employees accessed ~20' and ~25' working platforms of the scaffold used for masonry construction by climbing the structure. This condition exposed employees to a fall from heights hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  (a) On February 27, 2019, employees were working on an ~20' and an ~25' scaffold without fall protection. This condition exposed employees to a fall from heights hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means, as set forth in subparagraphs (i) - (iii) of this paragraph.:    (a) On February 27, 2019, employees doing masonry construction for residential housing, were exposed to fall from heights hazard of greater than 6 feet, when a scaffold with a height to base width ratio of more than four to one (4:1) was not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2400
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  (a) On February 27, 2019, employees doing masonry construction for residential housing, were exposed to fall from heights hazard of greater than 6 feet, when scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toeboards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.  (a) On February 27, 2019, The scaffold used by employees to perform masonry construction was not equipped with a toeboard or other means to contain or deflect falling objects. This condition exposed employees to struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,700 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):      (a) On February 27, 2019, employees doing masonry construction for residential housing, were exposed to fall from heights hazard of greater than 6 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2842

1926.1153 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
May 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  (a) On February 27, 2019, employees were operating a chop saw, with no water, while cutting bricks. This condition exposed employees to the hazard of inhaling dust containing silica.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2842

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343818142.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.