Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: PROFF PAINT COMPANY LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PROFF PAINT COMPANY LLC in 901 ENGLEWOOD PKWY, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 343818688.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Proff Paint Company LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Proff Paint Company LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
901 ENGLEWOOD PKWY
City
ENGLEWOOD
State
CO
ZIP
80110
Mailing
PO BOX 490, LITTLETON, CO 80160
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.453 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2019
Abate by
Mar 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $3,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) working in an aerial lift were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket:    a) On or about February 28, 2019, employees were exposed to fall hazards while working in an aerial lift.  The employees were climbing out of the basket to access the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $5304

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2019
Abate by
Mar 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: (Note:  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system):  a) On or about February 28, 2019, employees were exposed to fall hazards when working in an aerial lift with no fall protection in place. The employees did not have lanyards attached to any points in the basket.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2019
Abate by
Mar 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a) On or about February 28, 2019, and at times prior, employees were exposed to fall hazards in excess of 25 feet with no fall protection system in place.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2019
Abate by
Mar 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:  a)  On or about February 28, 2019, and at times prior, fall protection systems were not inspected prior to use and defective equipment was not removed from service.  A lanyard used by an employee did not have connectors on either end.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 19, 2019
Abate by
Mar 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a)  On or about February 28, 2019, and at times prior, employees had not been adequately trained in recognizing fall hazards and the procedures to minimize the hazards.   Employees did not recognize the hazards associated with working at heights and did not recognize the hazards associated with using defective equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343818688.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.