Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ROYAL BOATS, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ROYAL BOATS, LLC in 1876 JOE BRUER RD, DALEVILLE, AL 36322 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 343835393.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Royal Boats, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Royal Boats, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROYAL BOATS, LLC
Site address
1876 JOE BRUER RD
City
DALEVILLE
State
AL
ZIP
36322
Mailing
1876 JOE BRUER RD, DALEVILLE, AL 36322
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336612
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,700 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being struck by fragments of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) plastic pipe in the event that the PVC plastic pipe ruptured:    a)Entire facility; On or about March 6, 2019 and times prior, the employer exposed his employees to the hazard of being struck by fragments of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) plastic pipe in the event that the PVC plastic pipe ruptured. PVC plastic piping was used in exposed above ground locations to transport compressed air at 120 psi.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1700
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a) Production area; on or about March 6, 2019 and times prior the employer exposed employees to hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, fiberglass, resin, and acetone, without implementing a Respiratory Protection Program for those employees required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Production area; on or about March 6, 2019 and times prior and times prior the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that he allowed employees to use 3M half face respirators without being medically evaluated prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT:  a) Production area; on or about March 6, 2019 and times prior the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that he allowed employees to use 3M half face respirators without having been fit tested with the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01 VII

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1)(vii): The employer did not ensure that each user could demonstrate knowledge of the general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134:  a) Production area; on or about March 6, 2019 and times prior, the employer exposed employees to respiratory hazards in that he allowed employees to use 3M half face respirators without the training required in a Respiratory Protection Program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2019
Abate by
Sep 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  a) Facility; on March 6, 2019 and times prior the employer failed to document a hazard assessment of the site.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343835393.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.