Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JUAN CASTANEDA

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JUAN CASTANEDA in 658 WEST AVENUE, MILFORD, CT 06461 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343836524.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Juan Castaneda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Castaneda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JUAN CASTANEDA
Site address
658 WEST AVENUE
City
MILFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06461
Mailing
288 CARROLL AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2019
Abate by
Jul 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location: 658 West Avenue, Milford, CT 06461  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b and Citation 001, Item 002b with a final order date of June 21, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by May 19, 2019) following the abatement due date (May 9, 2019).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Jobsite:  The employees stripping and installing asphalt shingles on the 4 in 12 pitch residential roof were not protected from the hazard of falling approximately 16 feet 8 inches to the ground by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems/devices.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2019
Abate by
May 9, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Jobsite: The employees exposed fall hazards while working on the 4 in 12 pitch residential roof were not trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.   Jobsite:  The 18-foot aluminum extension ladder used to gain access to the lower roof at a height of approximately 16 feet 8 inches above the ground was not secured at its top and a grasping device was not provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2019
Abate by
May 9, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  Jobsite: The employees using the 18-foot aluminum extension ladder to access the roof were not trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Juan Castaneda's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343836524.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.