Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: PHILLIPS 66

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PHILLIPS 66 in 1400 SOUTH PARK AVENUE, LINDEN, NJ 07036 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 343855433.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Phillips 66 for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Phillips 66 is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PHILLIPS 66
Site address
1400 SOUTH PARK AVENUE
City
LINDEN
State
NJ
ZIP
07036
Mailing
1400 SOUTH PARK AVENUE, LINDEN, NJ 07036
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324110
Employees
811
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2019
Abate by
Jul 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $10,419 · Current $10,419
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.    a) Pipe Stills    The employer failed to document compliance with their chosen RAGAGEP such as, but not limited to ASME BPVC VIII Section UG-135(d).  Inlet & outlet valves for safety relief device SV5163 that protects vessel D605 from overpressure/rupture were not car sealed open.    Violation observed on or about 3/15/19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $10419
  • · Z (S) $10419

1910.119 J04 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2019
Abate by
Aug 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $10,419 · Current $10,419
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspection and testing procedures did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:    a) DSU-1 Unit    The employer failed to follow their chosen RAGAGEP, such as but not limited to, API 574 (2016), Section 7.4.5.3 for inspection and testing procedures when they did not replace and seal inspection plugs at CUI inspection points on the P101 discharge pipe, which operates at approximately 250 degrees F.    Violation observed on or about 4/4/2019.    b) Isomerization Unit, Mixer platform    The employer failed to follow their chosen RAGAGEP, such as but not limited to, API 574 (2016), Section 7.4.5.3 for inspection and testing procedures when they did not replace and seal inspection plugs at CUI inspection points on piping which operates at approximately 50 degrees F.    Violation observed on or about 3/18/2019.    c) Isomerization Unit, Mixer platform    The employer failed to follow their chosen RAGAGEP, such as but not limited to, API 574 (2016), Section 7.4.5.3 for inspection and testing procedures when they did not replace and seal inspection plugs at CUI inspection points on piping leading to rupture disk RD005, which operates at 30-65 degrees F.     Violation observed on or about 3/18/2019    d) SDA area, pipe leading to E603    The employer failed to follow their chosen RAGAGEP, such as but not limited to, API 574 (2016), Section 7.4.5.3 for inspection and testing procedures when they did not replace and seal inspection plugs at CUI inspection points piping leading to E603, which operates at 315-340 degrees F.     Violation observed on or about 3/15/2019.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $10419
  • · Z (S) $10419

1910.119 J06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2019
Abate by
Aug 21, 2019
Penalty
Initial $10,419 · Current $10,419
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(6)(ii): Appropriate checks and inspections were not performed to assure that equipment was installed properly and consistent with design specifications and the manufacturer's instructions.  a) Alkylation Unit Spent Acid Tank  The employer failed to verify equipment was installed as per design specifications before the TK100 was returned to service, including but not limited to an isolation valve on the instrument drain line. When TK100 was returned to service, employees were exposed to spent sulfuric acid as it leaked from the instrument drain line due to the missing isolation valve.  Violation was determined on or about 1/8/19.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $10419
  • · Z (S) $10419

1910.119 F01 I G

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 5, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(G): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and did not address the startup following a turnaround, or after an emergency shutdown.  a) Alkylation Unit  The employer failed to develop process equipment return to service procedures requiring verification that equipment replaced during the TK100 shut down was installed per design specifications to ensure safe operations. The Equipment Return to Service procedure (01.01.04.01) did not instruct operators to check instrumentation while walking down the line resulting in a leak of spent sulfuric acid from the instrument drain line due to a missing isolation valve.  Violation determined on or about 1/8/19
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Phillips 66's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343855433.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.