Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: TESSLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TESSLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. in 884 INDUSTRIAL STREET, ALBION, IL 62806 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 343859922.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tessler Construction Company, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tessler Construction Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
884 INDUSTRIAL STREET
City
ALBION
State
IL
ZIP
62806
Mailing
7705 SURNI LANE, CRYSTAL LAKE, IL 60012
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
17
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    a)    The employer did not ensure that its powered industrial truck operator was evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $3031

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $1,970 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): When a powered industrial truck was found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck was not taken out of service until it had been restored to safe operating condition:    a) The employer did not ensure that the PIV was inspected at least daily and was repaired or taken out of service when defects such as a faulty backup alarm were found.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1970
  • · Z (S) $3031

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2019
Abate by
Sep 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,477 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     a) At the site above, the employer did not develop, implement or maintain a written hazard communication program. Employees utilized hazardous chemicals with properties of, such as but not limited to, flammable liquids, oxidizing solids, corrosive liquids and denatured ethanol.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1477
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.1200 F06

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2019
Abate by
Sep 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6):  Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with either the information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section for labels on shipped containers or, product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provided at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, provided employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  a)    At the site above, the employer allowed employees to use chemicals that were placed into secondary containers, but did not ensure that the secondary containers were properly labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2019
Abate by
Sep 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they used:  a)    At the site above, the employer did not have safety data sheets in the workplace for any of the hazardous chemicals that the employees used or were exposed to, such as but not limited to, Isopropyl Alcohol, Nutrilife H2O2,  GC-30, Grocure, pH UP, pH Down.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 31, 2019
Abate by
Sep 17, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a)    At the above worksite, the employer did not ensure that the employees were provided training and information on the hazardous chemicals of the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Tessler Construction Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343859922.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.