Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: ALEX TROCHEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALEX TROCHEZ in 701 SUPERIOR AVE., BOGALUSA, LA 70427 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343869590.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Alex Trochez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Alex Trochez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ALEX TROCHEZ
Site address
701 SUPERIOR AVE.
City
BOGALUSA
State
LA
ZIP
70427
Mailing
27131 JUBAN RD., DENHAM SPRINGS, LA 70726
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.      a) On or about March 20, 2019, at 701 Superior Ave., Bogalusa, LA, the employer failed to ensure an employee wore eye protection while operating a Makita skilsaw.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2273

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,421 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:   a)  On or about March 20, 2019, 701 Superior Ave., Bogalusa, LA, the employer failed to ensure employees performing roofing operations wore fall protection or the edge protected by a guardrail system. The employees were up to approximately 15 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1421
  • · Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(2)(i): Each employee who was constructing a leading edge 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    a) On or about March 20, 2019, at 701 Superior Ave., Bogalusa, LA, the employer failed to ensure employees performing leading edge work wore fall protection or was protected by a complete guardrail system. Employees were 10 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343869590.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.