KENOSHA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: VISCO TEEPAK, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VISCO TEEPAK, LLC in 1126 88TH PLACE, KENOSHA, WI 53143 (NAICS 326121). OSHA activity number 343871323.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VISCO TEEPAK, LLC
- Site address
- 1126 88TH PLACE
- City
- KENOSHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53143
- Mailing
- 1126 88TH PLACE, KENOSHA, WI 53143
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326121
- Employees
- 104
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $11,934 · Current $4,775 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: (a) JMB Printing Press #5: On or about March 14, 2019, the employer did not insure printing press machine specific procedures were utilized by employee(s) when cleaning the surface of stationary components of the system and the ink roller, in-that the roller was not deenergized and was rotating. This exposed the employee(s) to ingoing nip point, crushing hazard and amputation injury. In the alternative... 29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employee(s) in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts and crushing hazards. (a) JMB Printing Press #5: On or about March 14, 2019, the employer did not insure Barrier guarding, interlock and/or light curtains were properly implemented as part of the integrated safety system for each of the four (4) separate color stations. This allowed the employee(s) to access the ink roller(s) in an energized state, and exposed the employee(s) to ingoing nip point, crushing hazard and amputation injury.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4775
- — Z (S) $11934
1910.219 F01 I
- Issued
- Jun 28, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $11,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(1)(i): Gears which were seven (7) feet or less above the floor or platform were not guarded by a complete enclosure. (a) JMB Printing Press #5: The employer did not insure a complete enclosure barrier guard or other guarding method(s) was properly implemented for the four (4) separate color stations on the printing press. This allowed the employee(s) to access the drive gears in an energized state and exposed the employee(s) to ingoing nip point, crushing hazard and amputation injury.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $11934
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326121)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343871323.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.