Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: G & A CONTRACTING LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of G & A CONTRACTING LLC in 2305 CORONA AVE, EAU CLAIRE, WI 54701 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343874970.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch G & a Contracting LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for G & a Contracting LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2305 CORONA AVE
City
EAU CLAIRE
State
WI
ZIP
54701
Mailing
1200 NORTH RANKIN STREET, APPLETON, WI 54911
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2019
Abate by
Oct 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.   (a) In regards to citation 2, item 1, issued on April 12, 2019, the employer failed to submit abatement certification within ten days of the abatement date, May 3, 2019.  The violation read as follows:   29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training or  when employer relied on training conducted by another employer, the certification record needs to indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  (a) 2305 Corona Ave, Eau Claire, WI., apartment # 2309; The employer did not provide certification of fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 4, 2019
Abate by
Oct 11, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  In regards to citation 1, item 1, issued on April 12, 2019, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, May 3, 2019.  The violation read as follows: 29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  (a) 2305 Corona Ave, Eau Claire, WI., apartment # 2309;  Employee(s) were allowed to walk/work from areas greater than 6 feet above ground level without adequate fall protection.  In regards to citation 1, item 1, issued on April 12, 2019, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, May 3, 2019.  The violation read as follows:  29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  (a) 2305 Corona Ave, Eau Claire, WI., apartment # 2309; Employee(s) removing shingles from a steep sloped roof were not utilizing fall protection when working at a fall height greater than 6 feet above ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $319

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Abate by
May 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  (a) 2305 Corona Ave, Eau Claire, WI., apartment # 2309;  Employee(s) were allowed to walk/work from areas greater than 6 feet above ground level without adequate fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Abate by
May 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  (a) 2305 Corona Ave, Eau Claire, WI., apartment # 2309; Employee(s) removing shingles from a steep sloped roof were not utilizing fall protection when working at a fall height greater than 6 feet above ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 12, 2019
Abate by
May 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training or  when employer relied on training conducted by another employer, the certification record needs to indicate the date the employer determined the prior training was adequate rather than the date of actual training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  (a) 2305 Corona Ave, Eau Claire, WI., apartment # 2309; The employer did not provide certification of fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343874970.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.