ATTLEBORO, MA ·
OSHA Inspection: ATTLEBORO PANCAKES, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ATTLEBORO PANCAKES, INC. in 383 WASHINGTON STREET, ATTLEBORO, MA 02703 (NAICS 722511). OSHA activity number 343876264.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ATTLEBORO PANCAKES, INC.
- Site address
- 383 WASHINGTON STREET
- City
- ATTLEBORO
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02703
- Mailing
- 383 WASHINGTON STREET, ATTLEBORO, MA 02703
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 722511
- Employees
- 42
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $8,051 · Current $8,051
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Establishment: Employer's PPE assessment did not include all elements required by this section such as: a) Selecting, and having each affected employee using, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment; b) Communicating selection decisions to each affected employee; and, c) Selecting PPE that properly fits each affected employee. The PPE assessment did not include PPE that would adequately protect body parts such as the eyes and hands of the employees who were exposed to hazardous cleaning products such as Oasys Sanitizer, Ultra Klene, Ultra San, chlorine bleach, Lime-Away descaler, Grease Express foam degreaser, and Grease Strip Plus.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $8051
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: Kitchen: Employer did not provide and ensure the use of protective eyewear to provide protection against splashes by corrosive liquid cleaning products such as Oasys Sanitizer, chlorine bleach, Ultra Klene, Ultra San, Lime-Away descaler, Grease Express foam degreaser, and Greasestrip Plus.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $8,051 · Current $8,051
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Kitchen: Employer did not provide suitable flushing facilities for eyes and face for employees who handle corrosive liquids such as Oasys Sanitizer, chlorine bleach, Ultra Klene, Ultra San, Lime-Away descaler, Grease Express foam degreaser, and Greasestrip Plus.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $8051
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $8,051 · Current $8,051
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Establishment: Employer did not develop and implement a Hazard Communication Program for employees who were exposed to hazardous materials such as Oasys Sanitizer, chlorine bleach, Ultra Klene, Ultra San, Lime-Away descaler, Grease Express foam degreaser, and Greasestrip Plus that included the following elements: a) Employee training in the hazards of the material they handle and measures that employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards. b) Non-routine tasks. c) Outside contractors. d) List of hazardous materials on site.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $8051
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 722511)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343876264.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.