Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPEC PLATING, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SPEC PLATING, INC. in 740 SEAVIEW AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 343877999.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Spec Plating, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Spec Plating, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPEC PLATING, INC.
Site address
740 SEAVIEW AVENUE
City
BRIDGEPORT
State
CT
ZIP
06607
Mailing
740 SEAVIEW AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06607
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2019
Abate by
Oct 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $2,652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least described how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, safety data sheets, and employee information and training would be met, and which also included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   WORKSHOP: The employer did not establish and implement a site-specific written hazard communication program, including Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for the employees required to work with and handle chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Sodium Cyanide, trichloroethylene, nickel sulfamate, and nitric acid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2652.3
  • — Z (S) $3789

1910.1200 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2019
Abate by
Oct 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not comply a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.      WORKSHOP: A complete list of all the hazardous chemicals used in the workplace with a product identifier was not maintained in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2019
Abate by
Oct 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    workshop: The employees required to work with and handle hazardous chemicals, such as (but not limited to) Sodium Cyanide, trichloroethylene, nickel sulfamate, and nitric acid were not provided training and information on the chemical hazard communications.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2019
Abate by
Oct 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    WORKSHOP: The employer did not verify through a written certification that the Workplace Hazard Assessment for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 13 exposed
Issued
Sep 11, 2019
Abate by
Sep 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  WORKSHOP: Each employee wearing 3M 8210 N95 respirators as a voluntary basis was not provided with the basic information presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Spec Plating, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343877999.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.