Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: A+ CLEANING SERVICES, INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of A+ CLEANING SERVICES, INC. in ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL 101 PAGE ST, NEW BEDFORD, MA 02740 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 343880985.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A+ Cleaning Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A+ Cleaning Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL 101 PAGE ST
City
NEW BEDFORD
State
MA
ZIP
02740
Mailing
464 HIGGINS ROAD, WEST YARMOUTH, MA 02673
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561720
Employees
28
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2019
Abate by
Jun 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    Location: St. Luke's Hospital    Employees were exposed to corrosive chemicals while using floor stripping products, and the employer did not ensure that there were suitable facilities for quick drenching and flushing of the eyes and body in the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $5304

1910.1200 E02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2019
Abate by
Sep 2, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(2)(ii): The employer's hazard communication program developed and implemented did not include methods the employer will use to inform the other employer(s) of any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect employees during the workplace's normal operations and in foreseeable emergencies:      Location: St. Luke's Hospital    The employer was using hazardous floor stripping products at a hospital respiratory unit and did not develop and implement a hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2652
  • · Z (S) $5304

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2019
Abate by
Jun 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:    Location: St. Luke's Hospital    Employees were exposed to corrosive chemicals while using floor stripping products, and the employer did not ensure that safety data sheets for the products were readily accessible at the worksite while the employees were using the product.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2652
  • · Z (S) $5304

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2019
Abate by
Jun 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer  Location: St. Luke's Hospital  Employees were provided with N95 respirators for protection against vapors from floor stripping products, and they were not provided with the basic information as presented in Appendix D, including reading and understanding the manufacturer's instructions, and understanding that N95 respirators do not protect against vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343880985.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.