Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TWIN STATE UTILITIES CORP.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of TWIN STATE UTILITIES CORP. in MECHANIC STREET, LEBANON, NH 03756 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 343905667.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Twin State Utilities Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Twin State Utilities Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
MECHANIC STREET
City
LEBANON
State
NH
ZIP
03756
Mailing
40 HARRIET DR., BRISTOL, NH 03222
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237110
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.1101 F02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2019
Abate by
Sep 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer failed to ensure that the exposure assessment was conducted in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by the exposure data or the lack of a negative exposure assessment:  Location: Mascoma Bridge Lebanon  On or about March 14, 2019, the employer did not conduct an exposure assessment where employees were hoe ramming concrete and conduit, that contained asbestos in the amounts of 2% Crocidolite and 15% Chrysotile.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.1101 K03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2019
Abate by
Sep 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(3)(i): Before the employer permitted its own employees to perform work subject to this standard in areas containing asbestos-containing material (ACM) and presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM), the employer did not identify the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material and/or presumed asbestos containing material therein pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1):  Location: Mascoma Bridge Lebanon  On or about March 14, 2019, the employer did not identify asbestos in the conduit that was broken up by employees hoe ramming.  The conduit contained asbestos in the amounts of  2% Crocidolite and 15% Chrysotile.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 O01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2019
Abate by
Sep 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(o)(1): The employer did not designate a competent person on construction worksites, having the qualifications and authorities for ensuring worker safety and health required by 29 CFR 1926.1101(C), General Safety and Health Provisions for Construction 29 CFR 1926.20 through 29 CFR 1926.32:  Location: Mascoma Bridge Lebanon  On or about March 14, 2019, the employer did not designate a competent person on the worksite where employees were breaking up concrete and asbestos containing conduit by hoe ramming it into pieces and shoveling the debris.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2019
Abate by
Sep 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $3,410

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  Location: Mascoma Bridge Lebanon  On or about March 14, 2019, employees working outside of the cab were not protected from inhalation of respirable crystalline silica, where the employer did not implement wet methods or dust suppression while hoe ramming concrete on a bridge.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3410
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2019
Abate by
Sep 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  Location: Mascoma Bridge Lebanon  On or about March 14, 2019, employees working outside of the cab, who were not following table 1 requirements were exposed to crystalline silica, where the employer had not assessed the exposure of each employee.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2019
Abate by
Sep 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:    Location: Mascoma Bridge, Lebanon NH    On or about March 14, 2019, The employer did not establish or implement a written exposure control plan where employees were exposed to crystalline silica while hoe ramming and removing concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3410

1926.1153 I02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 28, 2019
Abate by
Oct 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,410 · Current $3,410

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of at least the information contained in paragraphs (i)(2)(i)(A)-(i)(2)(i)(F) of this standard.    Location: Mascoma Bridge, Lebanon NH    On or about March 14, 2019, the employer did not provide training to employees that were on site working around concrete demolition, exposed to crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3410
  • — Z (S) $3410

View Twin State Utilities Corp.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343905667.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.