NASH, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: WRIGHT'S AUTO BODY & GLASS, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of WRIGHT'S AUTO BODY & GLASS, INC. in 112 E. NEW BOSTON ROAD, NASH, TX 75569 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 343910758.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WRIGHT'S AUTO BODY & GLASS, INC.
- Site address
- 112 E. NEW BOSTON ROAD
- City
- NASH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75569
- Mailing
- 112 E. NEW BOSTON ROAD, NASH, TX 75569
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B05 IV
- Issued
- May 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(iv): Space within the spray booth on the downstream and upstream sides of filters were not protected with approved automatic sprinklers: At the painting facility, the spray booth was not equipped with automatic sprinklers, exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.107 E09
- Issued
- May 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $3,179 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(9): Flammable liquids for use in spraying operations were transferred from one container to another without both containers being effectively bonded and grounded to prevent discharge sparks of static electricity: At the painting facility, the lacquer thinner dispensing barrel was not effectively bonded and grounded to containers used to clean out the spray gun, exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3179
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $3,179 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about March 22, 2019, and times prior in the spray booth area, the employer required an employee to use a 3M half face elastomeric respirator without having a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3179
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about March 22, 2019, and times prior in the spray booth area, the employer required an employee to use a 3M half face elastomeric respirator without providing the employee a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- May 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): On or about March 22, 2019, and times prior in the spray booth area, the employer required an employee to use a 3M half face elastomeric respirator without a qualitative fit test or quantitative fit test.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $3,179 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: In the spray booth area, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program when employees were required to use paints, thinners, and clear coats containing hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3179
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- May 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $425 · Current $255 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): At the facility, the employer did not conduct a hazard assessment to determine if personal protective equipment (PPE) were necessary.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $255
- · Z (O) $425
More inspections at Wright'S Auto Body & Glass, INC.
View Wright'S Auto Body & Glass, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343910758.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.