Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JUAN CASTILLO

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JUAN CASTILLO in 7820 GRANT LANE, OVERLAND PARK, KS 66204 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343922506.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Juan Castillo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Castillo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JUAN CASTILLO
Site address
7820 GRANT LANE
City
OVERLAND PARK
State
KS
ZIP
66204
Mailing
7905 LONGVIEW ROAD, KANSAS CITY, MO 64134
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  The employer did not provide the Occupational Safety and Health Administration certification of abatement as required for Citation #1, Item #2, issued June 4, 2019.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   Employees were exposed to fall hazards.  Employees engaged in residential roofing activities from a 6:12 pitch roof were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 25 feet from the roofs eave to the ground below.  Employees were not using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 4, 2019
Abate by
Jun 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Employees were exposed to fall hazards.  Employees engaged in residential roofing activities were not provided with fall protection training to ensure understand of the hazards associated with falls and the use of fall protection to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

View Juan Castillo's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343922506.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.