Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FINGERLAKES CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FINGERLAKES CONSTRUCTION in BYRNE DAIRY CORNER OF BUCKLEY ROAD & HENRY CLAY BLVD, LIVERPOOL, NY 13088 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 343923785.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fingerlakes Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fingerlakes Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
BYRNE DAIRY CORNER OF BUCKLEY ROAD & HENRY CLAY BLVD
City
LIVERPOOL
State
NY
ZIP
13088
Mailing
10269 OLD ROUTE 31, CLYDE, NY 14433
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 22, 2019
Abate by
May 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,282 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a)  At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 3/27/19:  An employee was on a 4:12 metal roof, with a ground to eave height of 12 feet, and without fall protection of any kind.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $9282

1926.502 D15

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 22, 2019
Abate by
May 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,630 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee  a)  At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 3/27/19:  An employee was using a personal fall protection system that included an anchorage attached to the peak with only 2 fasteners, not in keeping with the manufacturers instructions, and not able to support at least 5,000 pounds in a fall event.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6630

1926.502 D16 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 22, 2019
Abate by
May 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were rigged such that a employee could free fall more than 6 feet (1.8m) or contact a lower level:  a)  At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 3/27/19:  An employee was using a personal fall protection system that included a substandard anchorage and a lifeline with enough play in the line to ensure a greater than 6 foot free-fall in a fall event.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343923785.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.