BRIDGEPORT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: J. FERNANDES HOME IMPROVEMENTS, LLC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of J. FERNANDES HOME IMPROVEMENTS, LLC in 580 NORTH AVENUE, BRIDGEPORT, CT 06606 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343925004.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- J. FERNANDES HOME IMPROVEMENTS, LLC
- Site address
- 580 NORTH AVENUE
- City
- BRIDGEPORT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06606
- Mailing
- 281 WOOD HOUSE ROAD, FAIRFIELD, CT 06824
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 580 North Avenue, Bridgeport, CT 06606 Abatement certification and verification for Citation 01, Item 003a and Citation 01, Item 003b with a final order date of June 19, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by June 29, 2019) following the abatement due date (June 19, 2019).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $319
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- May 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Jobsite: The employees framing top deck of the building with pneumatic nail guns were not wearing appropriate types of eye and face protective equipment.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2842
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- May 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Jobsite: The employees walking and working on the top deck of the building were not protected from the hazard of falling by the use of appropriate types of fall protection systems/devices.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2842
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees exposed to fall hazards while working and walking on the top deck of the building were not provided with training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2273
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- May 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Jobsite: The employer did not verify through maintaining written certification that employees were provided with fall training in the past.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343925004.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.