STAMFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MARQUEZ ROOFING LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARQUEZ ROOFING LLC in 2040 LONGRIDGE ROAD, STAMFORD, CT 06903 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343940342.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARQUEZ ROOFING LLC
- Site address
- 2040 LONGRIDGE ROAD
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06903
- Mailing
- 579 COLUMBUS AVE, STRATFORD, CT 06615
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 2040 Longridge Road, Stamford, CT 06903 Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 1b; Citation 01, Item 01c and Citation 01, Item 02b with a final order date of June 28, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by July 6, 2019) following the abatement due date (June 26, 2019).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): Jobsite: The employees installing asphalt shingles on the 8 in 12 and 3 in 12 pitch roofs were not protected from fall hazards approximately 30 feet 11 inches and 11 feet 4 inches, respectively, to lower level by the use guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 31, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: Jobsite: The employees exposed to fall hazards while installing asphalt shingles on the 8 in 12 and 3 in 12 pitch roofs were not provided training and information in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- May 31, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. Jobsite: The employer did not verify through a written certification that the training for the employees exposed to fall hazards had been performed as complete.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Jobsite: The side rails of the extension ladder used to gain access to the lower roof did not extend at least 3 feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- May 31, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. Jobsite: The employees required to use an extension ladder to access the roof were not provided training and information in the proper means to erect the ladder, recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Marquez Roofing LLC
View Marquez Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343940342.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.