ORLANDO, FL —
OSHA Inspection: BENITO CONSTRUCTION LLC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of BENITO CONSTRUCTION LLC in 10375 VISTA OAKS CT., ORLANDO, FL 32836 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 343944914.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BENITO CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 10375 VISTA OAKS CT.
- City
- ORLANDO
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32836
- Mailing
- 2736 MIAMI TERRACE, KISSIMMEE, FL 34744
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 28, 2020
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $325 · Current $325
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) The employer failed to submit abatement for Citation 1, Item 1. b) The employer failed to submit abatement for Citation 2, Item 1.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $325
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about 04/18/2019, 10375 Vista Oaks Ct. - employees were exposed to a 10 feet 8 inch fall hazard while moving boxes of joint compound from a second story balcony, in that, fall protection was not used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer: a. On or about 04/18/2019, 10375 Vista Oaks Ct. - employees moving boxes of joint compound from a second story balcony exposed to a 10 feet 8 inch fall hazard, and were not provided with fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343944914.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.