Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEARJET INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of LEARJET INC. in 7336 AVIATION PLACE, DALLAS, TX 75235 (NAICS 488190). OSHA activity number 343947230.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Learjet INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Learjet INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LEARJET INC.
Site address
7336 AVIATION PLACE
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75235
Mailing
7336 AVIATION PLACE, DALLAS, TX 75235
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488190
Employees
170
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Sep 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $5,684 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about March 29, 2019, in the wide-body maintenance hanger, where the employer allowed an employee to use a 3M half face elastomeric respirator without providing that employee a medical evaluation to determine the employee's fitness to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5684
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Sep 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about March 29, 2019, in the wide-body maintenance hanger, where the employer allowed an employee to use a 3M half face elastomeric respirator and the employee was not required to pass a qualitative fit test or quantitative fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Sep 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $5,684 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:    On or about March 29, 2019, in the wide-body maintenance hanger, where an employee entered a fuel cell that was a permit required confined space without there being a danger sign warning employees that the fuel cell in which they were working on was a permit space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5684
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.146 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Sep 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $5,684 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(1): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not implement the measures necessary to prevent unauthorized entry:    On or about March 29, 2019, in the wide-body maintenance hanger, where an unauthorized employee entered a fuel cell that was a permit required confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5684
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.146 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Sep 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $5,684 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(2)(i): The employer did not provide training to each affected employee before the employee was first assigned duties under 29 CFR 1910.146, Permit-required confined spaces:    On or about March 29, 2019, in the wide-body maintenance hanger, where an unauthorized employee entered a fuel cell that was a permit required confined space and had not been trained prior to him entering the permit space to perform wiring work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5684
  • — Z (S) $9472

1910.146 E06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 24, 2019
Abate by
Sep 10, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,063 · Current $638 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(6): The employer did not retain each canceled entry permit for at least one year to facilitate the review of the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(14):    On or about March 29, 2019, in the wide-body maintenance hanger, where the employer did not retain the canceled permit utilized to enter the fuel cell which was a permit space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $638
  • — Z (O) $1063

View Learjet INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343947230.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.