Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL ANGEL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL ANGEL in 3539 N. RIFLE RANGE ROAD, GRAND CHUTE, WI 54913 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343948600.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Angel — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Angel is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIGUEL ANGEL
Site address
3539 N. RIFLE RANGE ROAD
City
GRAND CHUTE
State
WI
ZIP
54913
Mailing
206 E. JUNIPER LANE, APPLETON, WI 54915
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 6, 2020
Abate by
Feb 4, 2020
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a.  The employer did not provide abatement certification for the citations that were issued on May 8, 2019.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part.  The employer did not initiate and maintain safety programs including fall safety and ladder safety programs to ensure employees exposed to fall hazards while engaged in residential construction activities had knowledge of the hazards and the procedures needed to minimize them.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  The employer did not provide a training program for employees exposed to fall hazards while engaged in residential roofing.  Employees shall be trained to recognize fall hazards along with the procedures to be utilized to minimize the hazards such as utilizing conventional fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary. The program shall enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways, and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  The employer did not provide a training program for employees utilizing ladders to access roof surfaces.  The program shall ensure employees recognize the hazards related to utilizing portable ladders, and train employees in the procedures to be followed to minimize the hazards including extending the ladder three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about April 18, 2019, employees applying asphalt shingles with pneumatic nail guns were not utilizing eye protection on a single story residential home located at 3539 North Rifle Range Road Grand Chute, WI 54913.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  On or about April 18, 2019, employees roofing a new single story residential home located at 3539 North Rifle Range Road Grand Chute, WI 54913 were exposed to fall hazards over 9 feet without any form of fall protection.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  On or about April 18, 2019, employees roofing a new single story residential home located at 3539 North Rifle Range Road Grand Chute, WI 54913 utilized an aluminum extension ladder to access the roof that was not extended at least three feet above the upper landing.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

View Miguel Angel's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343948600.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.