Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS HERNANDEZ AGUILAR

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS HERNANDEZ AGUILAR in 145 OARSMAN CROSSING LOT #: 224, SAINT MARYS, GA 31558 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343964771.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Hernandez Aguilar — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Hernandez Aguilar is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
145 OARSMAN CROSSING LOT #: 224
City
SAINT MARYS
State
GA
ZIP
31558
Mailing
80 VILLAGE DRIVE, SAVANNAH, GA 31408
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.  a). West end of the residential house - On or about April 24, 2019, an employee did not wear a protective helmet when lifting sheets of plywood over his head, thus exposing the employee to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a). Roof of the residential house - On or about April 24, 2019, employees operated a pneumatic nail gun without the use of eye protection, thus exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  a). Roof of the residential house - On or about April 24, 2019, employees worked from the roof while installing plywood sheathing without the use of a fall protection system, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10.7 feet.  b). Back porch - On or about April 24, 2019, an employee worked from a porch beam while installing plywood sheathing without the use of a fall protection system, thus exposing the employee to a fall hazard up to approximately 9.6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  a). At the worksite - On or about April 24, 2019, the employer did not provide fall protection training to employees who worked from the roof and a porch beam without the use of a fall protection system, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 10.7 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow for the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device such as a grabrail was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  a). West end of the residential house - On or about April 24, 2019, a wooden job-made ladder was not secured to a rigid support and a grasping device was not provided, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 10.7 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step.  a). Back porch - On or about April 24, 2019, an employee used the top cap and top step of a Werner fiberglass stepladder (model: FS108), thus exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 9.6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  a). At the worksite - On or about April 24, 2019, the employer did not provide ladder training to employees that used a Werner fiberglass stepladder (model: FS108) and a job-made wooden ladder, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 10.7 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343964771.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.