RICHMOND HILL, GA —
OSHA Inspection: ALEX LOPEZ PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ALEX LOPEZ PEREZ in 9, 13, 17, 21 LEAF COURT LOT # 36, 37, 38, 39, RICHMOND HILL, GA 31324 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343964888.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALEX LOPEZ PEREZ
- Site address
- 9, 13, 17, 21 LEAF COURT LOT # 36, 37, 38, 39
- City
- RICHMOND HILL
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31324
- Mailing
- 167 BURNT CHRUCH RD., HARDEEVILLE, SC 29927
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a) At the jobsite, on or about April 22, 2019, employees performing wood framing activities while exposed to being struck on the head by materials and tools were not wearing head protection.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2273
- — I (S) $1136.5
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) At the jobsite, on or about April 22, 2019, an employee was performing wood framing activities that included operating a portable hand tool (pneumatic nail gun), without the use of eye protection
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2273
- — I (S) $1136.5
- — Z (S) $2273
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) At the jobsite, on or about April 22, 2019, an employee working on an upper level while performing wood framing activities was exposed to a fall hazard of up to 8.8 feet and fall protection was not provided.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2842
- — I (S) $1450
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) At the jobsite, on or about April 22, 2019, the employer did not provide adequate fall protection training to employees exposed to fall hazards of up to 8.8 feet while working on an upper level during wood framing activities.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.405 G02 III
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap: a) At the jobsite, on or about and at times prior to April 22, 2019, the Dewalt circular saws original flexible cord was spliced to a different flexible cord using black electrical tape, exposing employees to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $1705
- — Z (S) $1705
- — I (S) $877
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 17, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a) At the jobsite, on or about and at times prior to April 22, 2019, the end of the Dewalt circular saw's flexible cord was missing the strain relief, exposing an employee to electrical shock and burn hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
- — I (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343964888.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.