Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ABRAM PE?A

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ABRAM PE?A in 222 WHITEBARK TRAIL LOT # 83, RICHMOND HILL, GA 31324 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343965299.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Abram PE?A for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Abram PE?A is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ABRAM PE?A
Site address
222 WHITEBARK TRAIL LOT # 83
City
RICHMOND HILL
State
GA
ZIP
31324
Mailing
77 SHADY LANE, GARDEN CITY, GA 31408
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, employees performing wood framing activities while exposed to being struck on the head by materials and tools were not wearing head protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2273

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, employees were performing wood framing activities that included operating portable hand tools (pneumatic nail gun, circular saw), without the use of eye protection
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2273

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, an employee working on upper levels while performing wood framing activities was exposed to fall hazards of up to 23 feet and fall protection was not provided.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, the employer did not provide fall protection training to an employee exposed to fall hazards of up to 23 feet while working on upper levels during wood framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail:  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, a handrail was not provided on the stairway that provided access from the first floor to the second floor, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1705

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, a stair rail system was not provided on the open side of the stairway that provided access from the first floor to the second floor, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, the employer did not provide ladder and stairway safety training to employees, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2019
Abate by
Jun 6, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $1,705
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step:  a) At the jobsite, on or about April 26, 2019, an employee stood on the top step/cap of an 6 ft. A-frame step ladder to gain access to the second working level during wood framing activities, resulting in a fall hazard of up to 6 ft. onto floor sheathing.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1705

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343965299.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.