Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROMEO CRITTENDEN

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ROMEO CRITTENDEN in CATE STREET, PORTSMOUTH, NH 03801 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343965356.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Romeo Crittenden — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Romeo Crittenden is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROMEO CRITTENDEN
Site address
CATE STREET
City
PORTSMOUTH
State
NH
ZIP
03801
Mailing
3036 FOUNDER'S WAY, SAUGUS, MA 01906
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jun 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs necessary to ensure compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Standards:                 a. Site - On or about April 18, 2019, the employer failed to implement an accident prevention/safety and health program for employees exposed to worksite hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2500
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jun 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by wearing protective helmets:    a. Site - On or about April 18, 2019, employees assigned to work from the ground level were exposed to head injuries from falling materials or debris where hardhats were not provided or enforced to prevent the hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jun 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:    a. Site - On or about  April 18, 2019, employees engaged in framing activities while utilizing a pneumatic nail gun were exposed to eye injuries where safety glasses were not provided to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.701 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jun 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.701(b): 1926.701(b):  All protruding reinforcing steel, onto and into which employees could fall, was not guarded to eliminate the hazard of impalement:    a. Site - On or about April 18, 2019, employees were exposed to impalement hazards where protruding rebar was not guarded or covered to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jun 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system or personal fall arrest systems:    Instance a. Site - On or about April 18, 2019, employees engaged in framing activities from the third floor level were exposed to fall hazards where fall protection equipment was not provided or utilized to prevent the hazards.     Instance b. Site - On or about April 18, 2019, employees engaged in framing activities from the second floor level were exposed to wall and window openings where guardrails or a fall protection system was not utilized to prevent the hazard.       Instance c. Site - On or about April 18, 2019, employees engaged in framing activities from the second and third floor levels were exposed to open sided floors where floor covers or guardrails were not utilized to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2500
  • — C (S) $3978
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jun 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):    a. Site - On or about April 18, 2019, the employer failed to provide fall protection training to employees to ensure that the employees understood the hazards of falling and the means necessary to minimize or eliminate these hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jun 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76cm) whichever is less were not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:    Instance a.  Site - On or about April 18, 2019, both staircases leading to the second floor level were not provided with stair rails along each unprotected side or edge.       Instance b.  Site - On or about April 18, 2019, the staircases leading to the third floor level were not provided with stair rails along each unprotected side or edge.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2842
  • — Z (S) $2842

View Romeo Crittenden's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343965356.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.