OSHA Inspection: REYES GARCIA GAITAN

Issued

Oct 9, 2019

Abate by

Nov 5, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,410 · Current $3,410

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles.  a). At the worksite - On or about and times prior to April 24, 2019, employees operated pneumatic nail guns and a circular saw without the use of appropriate eye protection, thus exposing employees to eye injuries.

Issued

Oct 9, 2019

Abate by

Nov 5, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).  a). At the worksite - On or about April 24, 2019, employees worked from the top plates and ceiling joists of a residential structure without the use of a fall protection system, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 11.3 feet.

Issued

Oct 9, 2019

Abate by

Nov 5, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii).  a). At the worksite - On or about April 24, 2019, the employer did not ensure employees performing work from the top plates and ceiling joists of a residential structure were trained by a competent person on the fall protection requirements, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 11.3 feet.

Issued

Oct 9, 2019

Abate by

Nov 5, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step.  a). Interior of the residential structure - On or about April 24, 2019, an employee used the top step of a Franklin stepladder, thus exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 9.9 feet.