Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RANDOLPH D & L COMPANY, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of RANDOLPH D & L COMPANY, LLC in 915 BOIS D ARC STREET, COMMERCE, TX 75428 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 343982500.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Randolph D & L Company, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Randolph D & L Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
915 BOIS D ARC STREET
City
COMMERCE
State
TX
ZIP
75428
Mailing
915 BOIS D'ARC STREET, COMMERCE, TX 75428
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327390
Employees
25
Ownership type
Private (A)

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 B08

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Aug 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(8): The employer did not ensure ladders were used only for the purposes for which they were designed:    (a) In the manufacturing building, self-supporting stepladders were used in the folded position to access forms during manufacture of septic tanks.    (b) In the manufacturing building, self-supporting stepladders were used in the folded position to access castings during manufacture of storm shelters.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2652
  • · Z (S) $5304

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Aug 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following: guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall protection system, such as a personal fall arrest, travel restraint, or positioning system:    (a) In the manufacturing building, employees worked from the top of septic tank forms and were not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2652
  • · Z (S) $5304

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Oct 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:    (a) In the manufacturing building, a mixer operator did not wear protective clothing and equipment when exposed to skin contact hazards from concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1989
  • · Z (S) $3978

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Oct 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    (a) The employer did not verify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.  In the concrete mixing and pouring areas, employees were exposed to skin contact hazards from concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Oct 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    (a) The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to hazardous chemicals including concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1989
  • · Z (S) $3978

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Aug 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  (a) In the manufacturing building, safety data sheets were not readily accessible for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals including concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Aug 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  (a) In the manufacturing building, an employee voluntarily wore a half-mask elastomeric facepiece respirator and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program that included at least the medical evaluation, cleaning, maintenance, and storage components.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2019
Abate by
Aug 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  (a) In the manufacturing building, an employee voluntarily wore a half-mask elastomeric facepiece respirator and the employer did not provide the employee with advisory information in Appendix D.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343982500.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.