COMMERCE, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: RANDOLPH D & L COMPANY, LLC
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of RANDOLPH D & L COMPANY, LLC in 915 BOIS D ARC STREET, COMMERCE, TX 75428 (NAICS 327390). OSHA activity number 343982500.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RANDOLPH D & L COMPANY, LLC
- Site address
- 915 BOIS D ARC STREET
- City
- COMMERCE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75428
- Mailing
- 915 BOIS D'ARC STREET, COMMERCE, TX 75428
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327390
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 B08
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(8): The employer did not ensure ladders were used only for the purposes for which they were designed: (a) In the manufacturing building, self-supporting stepladders were used in the folded position to access forms during manufacture of septic tanks. (b) In the manufacturing building, self-supporting stepladders were used in the folded position to access castings during manufacture of storm shelters.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2652
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $2,652 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Except as provided elsewhere in this section, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following: guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall protection system, such as a personal fall arrest, travel restraint, or positioning system: (a) In the manufacturing building, employees worked from the top of septic tank forms and were not protected from falling.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2652
- · Z (S) $5304
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact: (a) In the manufacturing building, a mixer operator did not wear protective clothing and equipment when exposed to skin contact hazards from concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1989
- · Z (S) $3978
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: (a) The employer did not verify that a workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification. In the concrete mixing and pouring areas, employees were exposed to skin contact hazards from concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) The employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to hazardous chemicals including concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1989
- · Z (S) $3978
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s): (a) In the manufacturing building, safety data sheets were not readily accessible for employees exposed to hazardous chemicals including concrete containing portland cement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: (a) In the manufacturing building, an employee voluntarily wore a half-mask elastomeric facepiece respirator and the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program that included at least the medical evaluation, cleaning, maintenance, and storage components.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.134 K06
- Issued
- Jul 12, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer: (a) In the manufacturing building, an employee voluntarily wore a half-mask elastomeric facepiece respirator and the employer did not provide the employee with advisory information in Appendix D.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327390)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343982500.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.