SAN ANGELO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: VELCO OPERATIONS, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of VELCO OPERATIONS, LLC in 1309 PULLIAM ST, SAN ANGELO, TX 76903 (NAICS 332439). OSHA activity number 343988135.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VELCO OPERATIONS, LLC
- Site address
- 1309 PULLIAM ST
- City
- SAN ANGELO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76903
- Mailing
- 325 N MAIN STREET, SAN ANGELO, TX 76903
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332439
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,031 · Current $3,031
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer. On or about May 7, 2019, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that a written respirator program was implemented. Employees are required to wear Elipse P100 half face respirators when performing welding inside a permit required confined space. Employee(s) are exposed to inhalation hazard. (i)-Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace; (ii)-Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators; (iii)-Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators; (iv)-Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; (v)-Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding and otherwise maintaining respirators; (vii)-Training of employees in the respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations; (viii)-Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing the, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance; and (xi)-Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3031
1910.146 C04
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $5,304
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146: On or about May 7, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer failed to implement a permit confined space program. The employees are required to enter a permit required confined spaces to perform such task as, cutting, welding and alterations inside refurbished tanks/vessel. Employees exposed to such hazards as, but not limited to inhalation hazards and fire.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: On or about May 7, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure the employees were trained. The employees are required to conduct welding and cutting operations inside a permit required confined space. Employees exposed to such hazards as, but not limited to inhalation hazards and fire.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about May 7, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure employees operating the forklifts in the shop were trained. Employees exposed to a forklift incident. Employees exposed to the hazard of being struck-by a forklift.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about May 7, 2019, the employer failed to ensure the Delta Rockwell drill press was guarded at the rotating chuck. Employees use the drill press to drill holes in metal when necessary. Employees exposed to the hazard of being caught-in the rotating drill and chuck.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: On or about May 7, 2019, the employer failed to ensure the Delta Rockwell drill press was anchored to the floor. Employees use the drill press to drill holes in metal when necessary. Employees exposed to the hazard of being struck-by the drill press falling.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: On or about May 7, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer failed to ensure the internal conductors were not exposed at the strain relief area. Employees exposed to the hazard of an electrical shock. Such equipment as, but not limited too: 1. Delta Rockwell drill press, 110 volt, the internal conductors were exposed at the strain relief area on the plug. 2. Two (2) welders called Millermatic 252, 240/480 volt, the internal conductors were exposed at strain relief area at the plugs. 3. Miller welder XMT 450, 230/460 volt, internal conductors were exposed at the strain relief area were the cord comes out of the frame on the miller welder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $2,273
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about May 7, 2019, the employer failed to ensure that employees were trained on hazardous chemicals and aware of the location of the safety data sheets. Employees exposed to hazards such as, but not limited to, inhalation hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2273
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $758 · Current $758
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(a): The employer did not use an OSHA 300, 301 and 300A Form or equivalent: On or about May 7, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer did not maintain OSHA 300, 300a-A, and 301 or equivalent forms.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $758
1904.32 A03
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(3): The employer did not certify an OSHA 300-A Form or equivalent: On or about May 7, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer failed to certify the annual summary of work-related injuries and illnesses form OSHA 300-A.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
1904.32 A04
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(4): The employer did not post an OSHA 300-A Form or equivalent from February 1 to April 30 following the year covered by the form: On or about May 7, 2019, and times prior thereto, the employer did not post the annual summary (OSHA 300-A) form.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332439)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343988135.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.