BEDFORD, NH —
OSHA Inspection: RW&SA SERVICES CORP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RW&SA SERVICES CORP in 7 COLBY CT., BEDFORD, NH 03110 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 343993770.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RW&SA SERVICES CORP
- Site address
- 7 COLBY CT.
- City
- BEDFORD
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03110
- Mailing
- 32 SARATOGA STREET, LAWRENCE, MA 01841
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 6, 2020
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: a. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019. b. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 1b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019. c. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019. d. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 2b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019. e. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019. f. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 3b nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019. g. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019. h. The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation 1 Item 5 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 4, 2019.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $319
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): Site- Employees were not protected from a fall of 10.8 feet where each scaffold work platform was not fully planked.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide: Site- Employees were not protected from a fall of 10.8 feet where scaffold work platforms were less than 10 inches wide.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Site- Employees were not protected from a fall hazard where there was no access provided between a wood plank scaffold in the awning and a tube and coupler scaffold tower built from the ground. employees were climbing between the two scaffold platforms where the horizontal distance between the platforms was greater than 3 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. Site- Employees were not protected from a fall hazard where a Werner 8 foot step ladder was used to access the work platform of a scaffold tower and the top of the ladder was not secured to prevent displacement where the ladder was not long enough to extend three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: Site- Employees working from a scaffold in the awning were not protected from a fall hazard where a competent person did not inspect the scaffold before employees began working from the scaffold.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Site- Employees working from a scaffold in the awning were not protected from a fall hazard where a competent person did not erect the scaffold or oversee the scaffold construction.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 22, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: Site- Employees were not protected from a fall of 10.8 feet where fall protection was not provided by the employer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Aug 16, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. Site- An employee working from a scaffold who was not protected from a fall of 10.8 feet was not provided with scaffold training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2842
More inspections at Rw&Sa Services Corp
View Rw&Sa Services Corp's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343993770.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.