Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: OXFORD GENERAL INDUSTRIES, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OXFORD GENERAL INDUSTRIES, LLC in 3 GRAMAR AVENUE, PROSPECT, CT 06712 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 343994018.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Oxford General Industries, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Oxford General Industries, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3 GRAMAR AVENUE
City
PROSPECT
State
CT
ZIP
06712
Mailing
3 GRAMAR AVENUE, PROSPECT, CT 06712
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
8
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 21, 2019
Abate by
Sep 5, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   Location:  3 Gramar Avenue, Prospect, CT 06712  Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 01 and Citation 002, Item 01 with a final order date of July 10, 2019  was not received within 10 calendar days (by August 10, 2019) following the abatement due date (July 31, 2019).
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $319

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jul 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  WORKSHOP:  The ingoing nip points, created by the vertical belts and wheels under the work rests of the three (3) vertical Burr King belt sanders were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1591.1
  • · Z (S) $2273

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2019
Abate by
Jul 31, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not verified through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343994018.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.