PROSPECT, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: OXFORD GENERAL INDUSTRIES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OXFORD GENERAL INDUSTRIES, LLC in 3 GRAMAR AVENUE, PROSPECT, CT 06712 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 343994018.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OXFORD GENERAL INDUSTRIES, LLC
- Site address
- 3 GRAMAR AVENUE
- City
- PROSPECT
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06712
- Mailing
- 3 GRAMAR AVENUE, PROSPECT, CT 06712
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Aug 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $319 · Current $319
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 3 Gramar Avenue, Prospect, CT 06712 Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 01 and Citation 002, Item 01 with a final order date of July 10, 2019 was not received within 10 calendar days (by August 10, 2019) following the abatement due date (July 31, 2019).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $319
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,591 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: WORKSHOP: The ingoing nip points, created by the vertical belts and wheels under the work rests of the three (3) vertical Burr King belt sanders were unguarded.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1591.1
- · Z (S) $2273
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done: WORKSHOP: The employer had not verified through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343994018.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.