MYSTIC, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: DDM HOTEL MYSTIC, LLC
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of DDM HOTEL MYSTIC, LLC in 20 COOGAN BOULEVARD, MYSTIC, CT 06355 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 343997060.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DDM HOTEL MYSTIC, LLC
- Site address
- 20 COOGAN BOULEVARD
- City
- MYSTIC
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06355
- Mailing
- 20 COOGAN BOULEVARD, MYSTIC, CT 06355
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 721110
- Employees
- 96
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $7,956 · Current $7,956
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: COMPANY-WIDE: On or about and at times prior to May 9, 2019, the employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program. Hazardous chemicals used at the site include, but are not limited to, muriatic acid and other pool chemicals.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $7956
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,327 · Current $1,327
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation: 29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): 29 CFR 1904.29(b)(3): The employer did not enter the number of days away, job transfer or restriction on the OSHA 300 log within 7 calendar days of receiving information. COMPANY-WIDE: On or about and at times prior to May 9, 2019, entries on the 2018 and 2019 Form 300s were either incorrect or incomplete thereby materially affecting OSHA's ability to assess the health and safety of the facility in that: 1. An entry on the 2019 Form 300 for an injury that occurred on March 21, 2019 had not been completed. Column "H" was checked indicating that the employee had missed time from work but column "K" indicated no days away from work. 2. An entry on the 2018 Form 300 for an injury that occurred on December 25, 2018 was incorrectly recorded. Columns "K" and "L" indicated that the employee was out of work for seven days and on job transfer/restricted duty for an additional 18 days; however, a mark was made in column "I" indicating that the employee was only on job transfer or restricted duty.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $1327
1904.32 A01
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,327 · Current $1,327
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(a)(1): The employer did not review the OSHA 300 log to verify that entries were complete and accurate, and correct any deficiencies identified. COMPANY-WIDE: When preparing the OSHA Form 300A for calendar year 2018, the employer did not review the OSHA Form 300 for the year to verify all entries were accurate. Four injuries that occurred in 2018 were all recorded with marks in column "I" indicating "Job Transfer or Restricted Duty". Two of the cases involved days away; one was recordable with no days away and no transfer/restrictions. Because these errors were not identified and corrected when the Form 300A was completed, the CSHO's ability to assess the health and safety of the facility was materially impaired.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $1327
1904.41 A02
- Issued
- Jul 30, 2019
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,327 · Current $1,327
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.41(a)(2): The establishment had 20 or more employees but fewer than 250 employees at any time during the previous calendar year, and the establishment was classified in an industry listed in appendix A to subpart E of this part, and the employer did not electronically submit information from OSHA Form 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses to OSHA or OSHA's designee by the specified date. COMPANY-WIDE: The employer did not electronically submit information from the OSHA Form 300A Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses to OSHA by March 2, 2019.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $1327
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 721110)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 343997060.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.