SEYMOUR, CT —
OSHA Inspection: VIKTOR QOSJA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VIKTOR QOSJA in 49 DAY ST., SEYMOUR, CT 06483 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344008578.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VIKTOR QOSJA
- Site address
- 49 DAY ST.
- City
- SEYMOUR
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06483
- Mailing
- 169 WEST ST., SEYMOUR, CT 06483
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold platforms from that employees were required to work were fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold from that employees were required to work at a height more than 10 feet above the lower level was erected under the supervision of a competent person in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to work from the metal frame scaffold were trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to walk on and work from the roof at a height above 6 feet from the lower level were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to work from the metal frame scaffold platforms at heights above 10 feet were protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2000
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to walk on and work from the roof at a height above 6 feet from the lower level were protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.1051 A
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $1,705 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): Stairway(s) or ladder(s) were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, or no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided. Worksite: The employees were not provided with a stairway or ladder at the access point of the scaffold where the break in elevation exceeded 19 inches.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $600
- — Z (S) $1705
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344008578.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.