BRADFORD, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: PARKER LUMBER CO.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PARKER LUMBER CO. in 511 MIDDLE RD, BRADFORD, ME 04410 (NAICS 321113). OSHA activity number 344012034.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PARKER LUMBER CO.
- Site address
- 511 MIDDLE RD
- City
- BRADFORD
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04410
- Mailing
- 511 MIDDLE ROAD, BRADFORD, ME 04410
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321113
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.254 D09 III
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $1,895 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.254(d)(9)(iii): Cables with damaged insulation or exposed bare conductors were not replaced: Sawmill Floor - Cables on the Miller arc welder had cracked insulation and the connectors were melted.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1894.5
- · Z (S) $3789
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,137 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Facility - The Employer did not implement a written hazard communication program that describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1136.5
- · Z (S) $2273
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet: Facility - The Employer had not compiled a list of hazardous chemicals present in the workplace using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Facility - Employees were not provided with adequate training regarding the hazardous chemicals in their work areas, including the details of the hazard communication program developed by the Employer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321113)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344012034.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.