BIG LAKE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: HAMILTON OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of HAMILTON OILFIELD SERVICES, INC. in YO#2 UNIVERSITY, BIG LAKE, TX 76932 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 344054283.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HAMILTON OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- YO#2 UNIVERSITY
- City
- BIG LAKE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76932
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 60438, SAN ANGELO, TX 76906
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,282 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace which is used for the treatment of all injured employees, a person or persons shall be adequately trained to render first aid. Adequate first aid supplies shall be readily available: On or about May 28, 2019, and at times prior thereto, at the YO #2 University, employees were performing maintenance and/or repairs on a pump jack. The employer did not ensure that a person or persons was adequately trained to render first aid when required for the treatment of an injured employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $9282
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $9,282 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about May 28, 2019, at YO #2 University, Big Lake, Texas, employees were exposed to struck-by/caught-in hazards, when the pump jack was not enclosed by guards or barriers.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $9282
1904.39 A01
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,630 · Current $2,256 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(1): Within eight (8) hours after the death of any employee as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the fatality to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), U.S. Department of Labor: On or about May 31, 2019, the employer did not report within eight (8) hours of the death of an employee that resulted from work related incident.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2256
- — Z (O) $6630
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): Within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, you must report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye to OSHA: On or about May 28, 2019, the employer did not report within 24 hours a work-related incident resulting in in-patient hospitalization.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Nov 21, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $744 · Current $744
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: On or about May 24, 2019 and at times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure that workplace hazard assessment were performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date of the hazards assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $744
- — Z (O) $744
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344054283.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.