OSHA Inspection: CLINT GOUTY

Issued

Jun 25, 2019

Abate by

Jul 11, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     On or about June 4, 2019, Employees were exposed to struck by and fall hazards on a construction site in Westville, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the job site for unsafe activity and took necessary steps to eliminate or control the hazards.

Issued

Jun 25, 2019

Abate by

Jul 11, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:     On or about June 4, 2019, Employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck in the head by falling materials and tools, on a construction site in Westville, Illinois, and was not required to wear a hard hat while working underneath employees performing roofing activities.

Issued

Jun 25, 2019

Penalty

Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.     On or about June 4, 2019, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard on a construction site in Westville, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure an adequate fall protection system was being used.

Issued

Jun 25, 2019

Abate by

Jul 11, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,842 · Current $2,842

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:     On or about June 4, 2019, Employees were exposed to a fall hazard, while accessing and exiting the work area via an extension ladder, on a construction site in Westville, Illinois, and the employer did not ensure the extension ladder extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface.