Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GOOD PAINT LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GOOD PAINT LLC in 6292 COLORADO BLVD, COMMERCE CITY, CO 80022 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 344074489.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Good Paint LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Good Paint LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GOOD PAINT LLC
Site address
6292 COLORADO BLVD
City
COMMERCE CITY
State
CO
ZIP
80022
Mailing
6292 COLORADO BLVD, COMMERCE CITY, CO 80022
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325510
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,932 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 19, 2019, the employer did not implement a continuing, effective hearing conservation program when employees were exposed to TWA sound levels in excess of 85 dBA. A prepper in the powder coat area was selected to wear a Quest NoisePro dosimeter.  The employee was exposed to an average sound level of 93.2 dBA, which corresponds to a dose of  156%   This condition exposed the employee to the hazard of noise induced hearing loss. The monitoring was conducted for 523 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1932

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,932 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 12, 2019, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program when they required the use of tight fitting half mask respirators, as well as voluntary use of N95 respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1932

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 12, 2019, the employer did not assess respiratory hazards in the workplace. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards associated with powder coat, paint and paint thinners.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Abate by
Sep 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 12, 2019, the employer did not provide employees with medical evaluations prior to using respirators. This condition exposes employees to hazards associated with respiratory protection.    Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(a):  Employees were exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated (total dust), listed in Table Z-1, in excess of the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL):  (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 19, 2019, Good Paint LLC did not ensure that employee exposure to total dust did not exceed the 8 hour Time Weighted Average (TWA). An employee was exposed to particles not otherwise regulated (total dust) at a concentration greater than the 8 hour TWA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3. The employee was exposed to total dust at a concentration of 16 mg/m3 as an 8 hour TWA. Air monitoring was conducted for 463 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Abate by
Feb 14, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):   (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 19, 2019, Good Paint LLC did not ensure that employee exposure to particles not otherwise regulated (total dust) did not exceed the 8 hour Time Weighted Average (TWA). An employee was exposed to total dust at a concentration greater than the 8 hour TWA Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3. The employee was exposed to total dust at a concentration of 16 mg/m3 as an 8 hour TWA. Air monitoring was conducted for 463 minutes.   Abatement Note:  Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").    Abatement Note:  Feasible engineering controls include, but are not limited to:    1)                  Increasing air flow through the spray area.    2)                  Maintaining and cleaning the filters more frequently.     3)                  Ensuring powder coating equipment is adjusted properly to ensure the correct    amount of powder is being used.           STEP 1:           Effective respiratory protection shall be provided and used by exposed employees as an interim protective measure until feasible engineering and/or administrative controls can be implemented or whenever such controls fail to reduce employee exposure to within exposure limits.     STEP 1 ABATEMENT (15 DAYS):  August 29, 2019                         STEP 2:           Submit to the Area Director a written detailed plan of abatement outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to silica. The plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which should be consistent with the dates required by this citation:    (a)   Evaluation of the extent and location of the hazard source    (b)   Evaluation of control measure options    (c)   Selection of optimum control measures    (d)   Determination of control measure design    (e)   Ordering and delivery of equipment    (f)    Installation of control measures    (g)   Training of employees in proper operation and maintenance of newly implemented control measures    (h)   Assurance of the effective performance of control measures    All proposed control measures shall be evaluated for each particular use but a competent Industrial Hygienist or other technically qualified person. Thirty (30) day progress reports are required during the abatement period. The progress report must identify the action taken to achieve abatement and the date the action was taken.     STEP 2 ABATEMENT DATE (60 DAYS): October 14, 2019       Step 3:             Abatement will be completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and/or administrative controls and upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance.     STEP 3 ABATEMENT DATE (6 months): February 14, 2019
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Abate by
Sep 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,932 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 12, 2019, the employer did not adequately train employees on a Hazard Communication Program. This condition exposes employees to chemicals such as powder coat, paint, and solvents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $1932

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 18 exposed
Issued
Aug 14, 2019
Abate by
Sep 3, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): Visible gauges or audible alarms or pressure activated devices were not installed to indicate or insure that the required air velocity is maintained:    (a) Good Paint LLC, 6292 Colorado Blvd., Commerce City, CO 80022: On or before June 12, 2019, the employer did not have an anemometer installed on the spray area to ensure that the air velocity was adequate for spraying operations.     Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Good Paint LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344074489.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.