Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOE SQUID, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of JOE SQUID, INC. in 1410 PLANK ROAD, NEW MILFORD, PA 18834 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 344088810.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JOE Squid, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JOE Squid, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOE SQUID, INC.
Site address
1410 PLANK ROAD
City
NEW MILFORD
State
PA
ZIP
18834
Mailing
1410 PLANK ROAD, NEW MILFORD, PA 18834
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $850 Reduced

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:    a) Joe Squid: An employee, Stone Cutter and Stacker, was exposed to continuous noise at 80.5% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 88.4 dBA.  This exposure was observed over a 186 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 294 minutes not sampled.  The employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program for those employees exposed over the action level of 85 dBA, as discovered on or about 07/31/2019.    b) Joe Squid: An employee, Stone Thermaller, was exposed to continuous noise at 106.4% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 90.4 dBA.  This exposure was observed over a 192 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 288 minutes not sampled.  The employer did not develop and implement a noise monitoring program for those employees exposed over the action level of 85 dBA, as discovered on or about 07/31/2019.    ABATED DURING INSPECTION  NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $850
  • — C (S) $1705
  • — Z (S) $1705

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:    a) Joe Squid: An employee, Stone Cutter and Stacker, was exposed to continuous noise at 80.5% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 88.4 dBA.  This exposure was observed over a 186 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 294 minutes not sampled.  The employer did not maintain an audiometric testing program for those employees exposed over the action level of 85 dBA, as discovered on or about 07/31/2019.    b) Joe Squid: An employee, Stone Thermaller, was exposed to continuous noise at 106.4% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 90.4 dBA.  This exposure was observed over a 192 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 288 minutes not sampled.  The employer did not maintain an audiometric testing program for those employees exposed over the action level of 85 dBA, as discovered on or about 07/31/2019.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k):    a) Joe Squid: An employee, Stone Cutter and Stacker, was exposed to continuous noise at 80.5% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 88.4 dBA.  This exposure was observed over a 186 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 294 minutes not sampled.  The employer did not maintain a noise training program for those employees exposed over the action level of 85 dBA, as discovered on or about 07/31/2019.    b) Joe Squid: An employee, Stone Thermaller, was exposed to continuous noise at 106.4% of the exposure level of 90 dBA or an 8-hour time-weighted average of 90.4 dBA.  This exposure was observed over a 192 minute sampling period.  Zero exposure was assumed for the 288 minutes not sampled.  The employer did not maintain a noise training program for those employees exposed over the action level of 85 dBA, as discovered on or about 07/31/2019.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,705 · Current $850 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.1053(d)(1): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(3) of this section:    a) Joe Squid: Employees were exposed to silica in excess of the Action Level, and the employer did not perform the required exposure assessment, as discovered on or about 06/18/2019.    ABATED DURING INSPECTION  NO ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $850
  • — C (S) $1705
  • — Z (S) $1705

1910.1053 F02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.1053(f)(2)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:    a) Joe Squid: Employees were exposed to silica in excess of the Action Level, and the employer did not establish an exposure control plan for silica, as discovered on or about 06/18/2019.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 I01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.1053(i)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to each employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who has been occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year:    a) Joe Squid: Employees were exposed to silica in excess of the Action Level for 30 or more days per year, and these employees were not provided with silica medical surveillance, as discovered on or about 07/31/2019.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED    ABATEMENT NOTE:  The initial examination for silica shall meet the requirements of section (i)(2) of this standard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2019
Abate by
Jul 1, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) Joe Squid: Employees worked with hazardous chemicals, including, but not limited to, bluestone, and the employer did not establish and implement a hazard communication program, as discovered on or about 06/18/2019.    ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED    ABATEMENT NOTE:  Key elements of a hazard communication program are the written program (e), labeling (f), safety data sheets (g), and employee training (h).  The hazard communication training shall include those topics specified in section (h) of this standard and section (j)(3)(i) of 29 CFR 1910.1053.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View JOE Squid, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344088810.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.