Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BRIONES ESPINOZA MAXIMO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BRIONES ESPINOZA MAXIMO in 39 OLD FARM ROAD, CHAMPAIGN, IL 61821 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344105473.

Watch Briones Espinoza Maximo — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Briones Espinoza Maximo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
39 OLD FARM ROAD
City
CHAMPAIGN
State
IL
ZIP
61821
Mailing
39 SANIBEL DRIVE, URBANA, IL 61802
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:    On August 27, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through certification, that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:        a.    Citation 1, Item 1a,     b.    Citation 1, Item 1b,     c.    Citation 1, Item 2a,     d.    Citation 1, Item 2b,     e.    Citation 1, Item 4a,     f.    Citation 1, Item 4b
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $319.00 · Current $319.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):  The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement was complete for any serious violation for which the Agency indicated in the citation that such abatement documentation was required:     On August 27, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:        a.    Citation 1, Item 3a     b.    Citation 1, Item 3b
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to eye and fall hazards on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.  The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employees activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to eye and fall hazards on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.  The employer did not have a competent person at the construction site conducting frequent and periodic safety inspections.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2842.00 · Current $2842.00
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:  On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to eye hazards from the use of pneumatic guns without eye protection, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.   The employer did not provide employee training in order to provide the employees with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate those safety hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee was using eye protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to eye hazards from the use of pneumatic guns without eye protection, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3978.00 · Current $3978.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to fall hazards without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.  These fall hazards included:    a. 9 feet, 1st story and  b. 18 feet, 2nd story.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to fall hazards without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.  The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2273.00 · Current $2273.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:    On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that only extended 6 inches above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize hazards related to ladders and stairways:      On or about June 24, 2019, Briones Espinoza Maximo had employees exposed to fall hazards of 9 feet, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that only extended 6 inches above the upper landing surface of the roof, on a residential construction site in Champaign, Illinois.  The employer did not provide construction safety training to employees, in order to provide them with the knowledge necessary to recognize the hazards related to ladders, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate theses hazards.  This training would include:    a.         The nature of fall hazards in the work area,  b.         The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, and disassembling the fall protection systems to be used, c.         The proper construction use, placement, and care in handling of all ladders, d.         The maximum intended load carrying capacities of ladders, and  e.         The standards contained in this subpart, Subpart X  Stairways and Ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344105473.