GORHAM, ME —
OSHA Inspection: C.M. CIMINO, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of C.M. CIMINO, INC. in USM - WOODWARD HALL 80 UNIVERSITY WAY, GORHAM, ME 04038 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 344105655.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C.M. CIMINO, INC.
- Site address
- USM - WOODWARD HALL 80 UNIVERSITY WAY
- City
- GORHAM
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04038
- Mailing
- 3 WARREN AVENUE, WESTBROOK, ME 04092
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (Construction Reference: 1926.59): Job Site - The Employer did not have a written hazard communication program which describes how the labeling, safety data sheet, and training criteria will be met.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2386.8
- — Z (S) $3978
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use (Construction Reference: 1926.59): Job Site - The Employer did not have updated safety data sheets nor were SDS's available for all materials such as silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59): Job Site - Employees were not trained in the hazards of the chemicals found at the jobsite including Portland cement and silica containing materials.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 I01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(1): The employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in the program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (HCS) (29 CFR 1910.1200): Job Site - The Employer did not include respirable crystalline silica in their hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Job Site - Employees performing demolition activities were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2386.8
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.850 A
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.850(a): Evidence in writing was not available that an engineering survey performed by a competent person had been performed prior to permitting employee(s) to start demolition operations: Job Site - The Employer had not conducted an engineering survey prior to the start of demolition operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2386.8
- — Z (S) $3978
1926.1153 F01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,705 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(f)(1): The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica and wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods were feasible: Job Site - The Employer allowed employees to dry sweep concrete block demolition debris from the floor of the first floor bathroom.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1705.2
- — Z (S) $2842
1926.1153 G01
- Issued
- Jul 19, 2019
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,842 · Current $1,705 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: Job Site - The Employer did not develop and implement a written exposure control plan for employees exposed during the demolition and clean up of materials containing crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1705.2
- — Z (S) $2842
More inspections at C.M. Cimino, INC.
View C.M. Cimino, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344105655.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.