Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RJ SHORE COLLISION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RJ SHORE COLLISION, LLC in 34 FULTON STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06513 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 344106042.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RJ Shore Collision, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RJ Shore Collision, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
34 FULTON STREET
City
NEW HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06513
Mailing
34 FULTON STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06513
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811111
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $2,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides of the spray booth were not kept free from storage or combustible construction:    WORKSHOP:  The western, eastern, northern, and top sides of the paint room/paint booth (unknown identification) were not maintained with a clear space of not less than three (3) feet at all times.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $3031

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $2,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): In any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures:     WORSKHOP:  The employer had not established and implemented a written respiratory protection program with work-site specific procedures consisting of employee training, proper selection, fit testing, and medical evaluations where employees were required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks such as (but not limited to) spray painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $3031

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): The employer did not provide the training prior to requiring the employee to use a respirator in the workplace  WORKSHOP: The employer had not provided training and information prior to allowing the employees to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks such as (but not limited to) spray painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,789 · Current $2,640 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    WORKSHOP:  The employees required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks such as (but not limited to) spray painting had not been medically evaluated to determine the employee's ability to wear a respirator prior to fit test and prior to wearing respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2640
  • — Z (S) $3789

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  WORKSHOP: The employees required to wear half facepiece cartridge respirators during the tasks such as (but not limited to) spray painting had facial hair that came between the seal of the facepiece and their face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,031 · Current $2,120 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented a written hazard communication program, including the Globalized Harmonized System (GHS), where employees were required to work with chemicals such as (but not limited to) paints and welding gases.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2120
  • — Z (S) $3031

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use:  WORKSHOP: The employer did not maintained the safety data sheets for paints and welding gases used by employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  WORKSHOP:  The employees required to work with chemicals such as (but not limited to) paints and welding gases were not provided with training and information on the hazards associated with each product and chemical and the means to minimized and/or eliminate those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 16, 2019
Abate by
Aug 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(a): A Log of all Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300), and/or Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, (OSHA Form 300-A), and/or the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) or equivalent forms were not kept by the establishment:    ESTABLISHMENT:  The employer did not maintained the Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illness (OSHA Form 300), Summary of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses (OSHA Form 300A), and the Injury and Illness Incident Report (OSHA Form 301) for the years of 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $700
  • — Z (O) $1000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344106042.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.