HUNTSVILLE, AL —
OSHA Inspection: HIGH SEC LABS INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HIGH SEC LABS INC. in 2995 WALL TRIANA HIGHWAY SUITE B8, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35824 (NAICS 334519). OSHA activity number 344125679.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HIGH SEC LABS INC.
- Site address
- 2995 WALL TRIANA HIGHWAY SUITE B8
- City
- HUNTSVILLE
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35824
- Mailing
- 2995 WALL TRIANA HIGHWAY SUITE B8, HUNTSVILLE, AL 35824
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 334519
- Employees
- 53
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2019
- Abate by
- Oct 21, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $6,630 · Current $3,978 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: (a) On or about 08/21/2019 - Warehouse, several exit routes were obstructed with items, such as pallets and boxes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3978
- — Z (S) $6630
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $3,182 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there was a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet were exposed to electrical hazards: (a) On or about 06/27/2019 - Warehouse, employees exposed to crushing hazards from falling materials and working in an environment with forklift traffic were not required to wear protective footwear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3182.4
- — Z (S) $5304
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 4, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): (a) On or about 06/27/2019 - Warehouse, the employer did not assess the workplace to identify hazards associated with warehouse operations necessitating the use of protective footwear such as, falling materials and the operation of powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.176 A
- Issued
- Sep 10, 2019
- Abate by
- Nov 15, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,304 · Current $3,182 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(a): Permanent aisles or passageways were not appropriately marked: (a) On or about 06/27/2019 - Warehouse, permanent aisles or passageways were not marked exposing employees to struck-by hazards when retrieving merchandise in aisles where mechanical handling equipment was being operated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3182.4
- — Z (S) $5304
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 334519)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344125679.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.