Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HILLCREST MANOR APARTMENTS, LLC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HILLCREST MANOR APARTMENTS, LLC. in 587 MAIN STREET, NEW YORK MILLS, NY 13417 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344145578.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hillcrest Manor Apartments, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hillcrest Manor Apartments, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
587 MAIN STREET
City
NEW YORK MILLS
State
NY
ZIP
13417
Mailing
587 MAIN STREET, SUITE 104, NEW YORK MILLS, NY 13417
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:    a) West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was working on a scaffold platform that was not fully planked, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of up to 57 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.451 B01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1)(i): Each platform unit (e.g., scaffold plank, fabricated plank, fabricated deck, or fabricated platform) was not installed so that the space between adjacent units and the space between the platform and the uprights were no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, except where the employer can demonstrate that a wider space is necessary:     a)West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was working on a scaffold platform that exhibited a 3 inch wide gap between platforms, exposing the employee to tripping.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(3): The front edge of all platforms was not 14 inches (36 cm) or less from the face of the work, and no guardrail systems were erected along the front edge and/or no personal fall arrest systems were used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling:    a) West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was working on a scaffold platform with a 28 inch wide gap between the front of the platform and the face/wall of the building, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of up to 57 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms:    a) West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was working on a scaffold platform with unprotected open ended scaffold frames, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of 57 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G04 XV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing used in place of a midrail was unacceptable because the crossing point of two braces was not between 20 inches (0.5 m) and 30 inches ((0.8 M) above the work platform:     a) West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was working on a scaffold platform with cross braces used as a full guardrail system, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of 57 feet to the pavement below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Abate by
Nov 4, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:    a) West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was working on a scaffold system without the training necessary to recognize the hazards associated with scaffold work, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of 57 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(1)(ii): Supported scaffolds with a height to base width ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by installing guys, ties, and braces according to the manufacturer's recommendations:    a) West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was working on a nine tier scaffold system that was tied to the building using a system that was not per the scaffold manufacturer recommendations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $3,978
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:    a) West side of building, on or about 7-11-19:  One employee was using cross braces and scaffold frames for scaffold access, exposing the employee to a fall hazard of up to 57 feet to the pavement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3978

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344145578.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.