Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GENESIS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GENESIS GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 156 NATIONAL AVE., WATERBURY, CT 06705 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 344171574.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Genesis General Construction, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Genesis General Construction, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
156 NATIONAL AVE.
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06705
Mailing
35 BALDWIN AVE., WATERBURY, CT 06706
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,273 · Current $1,590 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, form or scrap lumber with protruding nails was not kept clear from work areas.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that roof debris with protruding nails was removed from the employee's work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1590
  • — Z (S) $2273

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees exposed to overhead falling debris were protected from head injuries by the use of protective helmets.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,978 · Current $2,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b).    Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees engaged in residential construction activities on the residential roof were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2750
  • — Z (S) $3978

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees required to work on the roof at a height above 6 feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.552 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,842 · Current $1,980 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.552(a)(1): The employer did not comply with the manufacturer's specifications and limitations applicable to the operation of all hoists and elevators.       Worksite: The ladder type material hoist/ladder vader that employees required to use to gain access to the roof at a height of 24 feet above the ground was not designed to be used in such a manner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1980
  • — Z (S) $2842

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 19, 2019
Abate by
Aug 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards.   Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees required to use a ladder type material hoist/ladder vader to gain access to the roof were trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to recognize and minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Genesis General Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344171574.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.