Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A & R STUCCO, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of A & R STUCCO, INC. in 16541 S. US HIGHWAY 301, SUN CITY CENTER, FL 33573 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 344172978.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A & R Stucco, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A & R Stucco, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
A & R STUCCO, INC.
Site address
16541 S. US HIGHWAY 301
City
SUN CITY CENTER
State
FL
ZIP
33573
Mailing
1541 E. SHELL POINTE RD., RUSKIN, FL 33570
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  a) On or about July 17, 2019, at the southeast side of the commercial building, the second level of the supported scaffold used by employees to scratch stucco surface on front parapet wall was not fully planked, exposing employees to a 12 foot fall hazard.   b) On or about July 17 2019, at the northeast side of the commercial building, the second level of the supported scaffold used by employees to apply plaster stucco on the wall was not fully planked, exposing the employees to a 10 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, and uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  a) On or about July 17, 2019, at the southeast side of the commercial building, the tubular framed scaffolding system 2 tiers high being used by employees plastering stucco was missing mudsills in all frames, exposing employees to fall, collapse and struck by hazards.  b) On or about July 17, 2019, at the northeast side of the commercial building, the tubular framed scaffolding system 2 tiers high being used by employees plastering stucco was missing mudsills in all frames, exposing employees to fall, collapse and struck by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  a) On or about July 17, 2019, at the southeast northeast sides of the commercial building, employees used the tubular components of the scaffold to access the two levels of the frame scaffold.  b) On or about July 17, 2019, at the northeast sides of the commercial building, employees used the tubular components of the scaffold to access the two levels of the frame scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.  a) On or about July 17, 2019, at the southeast side of the commercial building, the north end of the second level of the supported scaffold used by employees to plaster stucco on the wall had no guardrail system installed, exposing the em employees to a 12 foot fall hazard.  b) On or about July 17, 2019, at the northeast side of the commercial building, the north end of the second level of the supported scaffold used by employees to plaster stucco on the wall had no guardrail system installed, exposing the employees to a 10 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $2,313 · Current $2,313
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  a) On or about July 17, 2019 at the southeast and northeast sides of a commercial building, employees working on a supported scaffold while plastering stucco on the exterior wall had not been trained on the hazards of the scaffolding system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2313

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee who was involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in:  (a)  On or about July 17, 2019, employees required to erect and dismantle masonry scaffold systems for work crews applying stucco cement to outside of a single story commercial building.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) On July 17, 2019, at the east side of the commercial building; for employees handling hazardous materials such as but not limited to stucco cement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.51 F03 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 16, 2020
Abate by
Feb 12, 2020
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.51(f)(3)(iii): Hand soap or similar cleansing agents was not provided:  a)  On or about July 17, 2019, for employees without hand protection, mixing, applying and scratching stucco cement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View A & R Stucco, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344172978.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.