BRUNSWICK, GA ·
OSHA Inspection: MANUEL CLAROS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MANUEL CLAROS in 116 GATEWAY CENTER BOULEVARD, BRUNSWICK, GA 31525 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 344189410.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANUEL CLAROS
- Site address
- 116 GATEWAY CENTER BOULEVARD
- City
- BRUNSWICK
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31525
- Mailing
- 2404 HOLLANDALE CIRCLE APT. A, ARLINGTON, TX 76010
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,410 · Current $2,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. a). At the worksite - On or about July 19, 2019, the employer did not provide instruction to an employee on the safety rules and precautions associated with the operation of Skyjack Telescopic Boom lift (model: SJ82T), thus exposing an employee to a fall hazard up to approximately 8.6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2046
- · Z (S) $3410
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $1,364 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. a). Rear (northside) of the hotel - On or about July 19, 2019, the employer did not ensure an employee who operated a pneumatic nail gun and hammer utilized eye protection, thus exposing the employee to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1363.8
- · Z (S) $2273
1926.453 B02 IV
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,410 · Current $2,046 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(iv): Employee(s) were not standing firmly on the floor of the basket, and sat or climbed on the edge of the basket, or were using planks, ladders, or other devices for a work position. a). Rear (northside) of the hotel - On or about July 19, 2019, an employee climbed and stood on the platforms guardrail system of a Skyjack Telescopic Boom lift (model: SJ82T), thus exposing the employee to a fall hazard up to approximately 8.6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2046
- · Z (S) $3410
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift. a). Rear (northside) of the hotel - On or about July 19, 2019, personal fall protection equipment was not worn by an employee working from the platform of a Skyjack Telescopic Boom lift (model: SJ82T), thus exposing the employee to a fall hazard up to approximately 8.6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.501 B14
- Issued
- Nov 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Dec 3, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,978 · Current $2,387 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(14): Each employee working on, at, above, or near wall openings (including those with chutes attached), where the outside bottom edge of the wall opening was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels and the inside bottom edge of the wall opening is less than 39 inches (1.0 M) above the walking/working surface, is not protected from falling by the use of a guardrail system, a safety net system, or a personal fall arrest system. a). Rear (northside) of the hotel, 2nd floor - On or about July 19, 2019, an employee who worked at a window opening was not protected from falling by the use of a fall protection system, thus exposing the employee to a fall hazard of approximately 14.6 feet.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2386.8
- · Z (S) $3978
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 344189410.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.